Since having this blog, I’ve reported several times how Google Panda took a couple of swipes at my websites in 2011. Every time I was in a tailspin of worry and doubt – being somewhat new to the game, despite what my friend Michelle counsels in her emails and comments:
It’ll bounce back…give it time…
And let’s face it – it makes for a fun read. My most popular blog posts tend to be my “What is Google doing now?” posts, because frankly nobody but Google knows for sure.
Well something I didn’t really report too well on, because I don’t want to be an alarmist, is that around Christmas of 2011, Google Panda struck again…it’s not the first time.
Check this out from May-June of 2011:

Google Panda Heart Attack
That dip cost me about $2k-$5k in income, which is no skin off Google’s back – but it also dipped into my savings. That was the worst I’ve felt the effects of Google Panda, and it was confusing since scraper sites were out-ranking mine.
Granted, in Google, so long as you re-write what you scrape – which my scrapers did – then you can still rank as well as “original content.” But of course, Google is concerned about quality results, right?
Don’t kid yourself. Anyway, the reality is that “smart scrapers” took my best-performing site and scraped and re-wrote my content, and I thought they were gone for good…but actually they’re ranking just fine these days.
The point of the story though is to show you what my recent dip did in December:

Google Panda Sandbox December 23 2011
I haven’t had much time to dwell on the decline in rankings but let me say that I’m pretty much done biting my nails. This is at least the third time in one calendar year where I saw the effects of Google’s Panda update.
Every time I’ve seen these drop in rankings, they come back on their own.
During this most recent development, where several pages tanked on my site (and this time it was a different set of web pages, with a few exceptions), I wasn’t worried: I was making plenty of sales on the site.
It finished 2011 strong, despite having lost rankings at the tail end of December – only to bounce back as strong as ever the first week of January, 2012.
How I Beat Google Panda
Simple. I took my own advice in Duct Tape SEO. I have strong on-page SEO, without sounding like it. I mean I don’t do the typical keyword stuffing everyone suggests is what makes for good SEO.
It’s in the book. :)
But the other thing I did: nothing.
- I didn’t build links.
- I didn’t panic.
- I didn’t ask Google for a re-inclusion via Google Webmaster Tools.
- I didn’t hire some spammer on Fiverr to hit me with 100,000 useless links.
- I didn’t call the president to ask Congress to declare war on Google.
- I didn’t occupy Google or Wall Street.
I kept my head together and did the unthinkable:
I kept writing my latest book – which is done but for the final edits and finishing touches. I literally did nothing but check rankings with Market Samurai.
After being Panda-attacked a few times in 2011, I realize they “do” this:
- At some point, your site will be tagged by some bot – and I’m not sure if there’s a way to avoid getting tagged for inspection, but this is my suspicion.
- Every site tagged by the Panda-bot (for lack of a better term) gets inspected by the algorithm.
- For whatever reason, tagged sites will be sandboxed and other sites take their place in the SERPs.
- If no better replacement is found, the site returns to its former place.
What evidence do I have for this process? Not much but plenty of reading and watching my own websites behave in weird ways. For whatever reason, my sites come back every time.
So might I be doing something wrong to trigger the inspection?
Is there such an inspection?
Honestly I’m not sure, but I do know that I have many sites that aren’t affected – ever – by Panda. But my main earner gets tagged 3 times a year – maybe more in future, maybe never again, who knows.
Time will tell.
What I recommend:
Don’t panic. Find some other progress to make or build links.
Every time I got hit, except the first time when I removed AdSense and some affiliate links (reducing the number of affiliate links on every page to about 3-5 tops) – I did nothing and the site came back just fine or did better.
And every single time, the site either gained PageRank or remained the same.
I know that Google runs Panda before PageRank updates, at least that’s the 2011 pattern, and every time I got hit I’d check other forums or blogs and sure enough: it was widespread. Google hits a number of sites with this “sandbox” effect and the sites either die a cruel death never to return or they bounce back.
How do you make sure you site bounces back? I’m not sure, really, other than I strongly recommend my book Duct Tape SEO for a content quality standard.
Why toot my own horn? Because I found out what Google wants and I give it to them. I’m not worried about Panda. It’s an inconvenience, but not the death of my business by any stretch.
Get Your Discount for My WordPress SEO Book, Duct Tape SEO – Panda-Proof and Proven Rankings:

(Use Discount Code “Happy2012″ At Checkout)
(That was subtle, right?)
I’m not sure what Google has in store for 2012, but I’m not too worried any more. Honestly I’m not much for building thousands of links, and when it comes down to it, if I need to do that, I’m set with tools and what works.
If Google dropped off the face of the planet, and my traffic went with it – it would just be a matter of time to replace that traffic with various other traffic resources that don’t depend on Google.
What I’ve Been Up To
Some of you have been kind enough to wonder: why have I dropped off the face of the planet lately? Since I know there are at least 4 people that read this, I owe you an explanation:
- Writing my new book as methodically as I wrote Duct Tape SEO, but this one’s on making money online. It’s going to be much cheaper than you might expect, too. Trying something different.
- Playing Modern Warfare 3 on my son’s XBox and trying not to get too hooked. It doesn’t have zombie maps so whatev’s…and I clearly have a life (read: I am the world’s worst player apparently).
- Celebrating 3 January birthdays (2 y/o son, 4 and 6 y/o daughters).
- Enjoying visiting family (sister-in-law, she’s fantastic).
- Filing plenty of DMCA requests and getting pages de-indexed from Google. Suckas. By the way, Google makes it painless to do, have to give it to them: they rock at de-indexing piracy…
I had a great end of year in terms of earnings, so I’m fighting the itinerant lazy-bones effect (I did this my senior year in high school, too…you know you’re going to pass so why try? – it’s pathetic, really).
But this book is hopefully going to help people make some serious money online, and I want my latest book to be a solid offering. I’m pretty picky with content…
So that’s what I’ve been doing lately. Now getting back to the main point of this post:
Lesson: Don’t Sweat Panda
It’s really not that scary. Honestly. Sure: Google can jack your traffic for a while, but they don’t own web traffic – anyone depending solely on SEO traffic should diversify traffic sources – but if you build sites properly to begin with you should have little to worry about.
Of course not everyone is going to be as “lucky” as I am…but I don’t think it’s luck any more.
I can’t guarantee that my methods will keep Panda at bay, but if you follow them, your sites should stand a better chance in my opinion.
If you do get “Pandalized,” then wait about 3-4 weeks before really worrying about it. You shouldn’t just have one site making you cheddar anyway, just MHO.
I’ve got a book to write, be back shortly I think…Thanks for reading.
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!








I didn’t think there were any Panda updates in December. Did you read that there were?
Carrie recently posted..My 2011 Reflections and 2012 Plans
Yeah:
http://www.seroundtable.com/google-panda-32-14493.html
There were a couple of other places I read where some pages were affected vs. a whole site, which was my case. The pattern of the dip is the same as previous Panda updates.
Ah, thanks. I had heard there weren’t to be anymore towards the end of the year but I guess there were still minor updates. I lost a few keyword rankings on one of my sites, just can’t remember now when exactly it started.
Carrie recently posted..My 2011 Reflections and 2012 Plans
I am also using softwares like cuterank and rank tracker. This usually happens to most of the sites but it hurts when you lose a big site from the SERPs for a week.
Rahul recently posted..Online Income analysis year – year
Well speaking of rank tracking software, there’s a good one for $17 called Magic Rank Tracker that does a good job, too. Has keyword suggestions as well.
For the price, if you have other tools you need – it’s a good solution.
The new “sandbox” from Panda is sorta weird…but yeah: it can hurt on a successful site for sure! Definitely reason to have other traffic generation methods in place outside of Google traffic.
James Hussey recently posted..A Backlink Checker Besides Yahoo Site Explorer
Wow this is good tool for small niche tracking and have 3yrs of tracking but it don’t compete with rank tracker. But i like it very cheap as compared to other tool and decent enough.
Rahul recently posted..Online Income analysis year – year
I believe Google panda has struck my site.I was ranking high for all of my keywords prior to Friday 13th 2012. Now suddenly my site has disappeared from the search engine result pages.I’m new to internet marketing and I could not understand why my site vanished overnight.I’m praying that I can recover.
Howard recently posted..Get Free Baby Food
Sorry to hear it, hope it bounces back.
“Writing my new book as methodically as I wrote Duct Tape SEO” that just scared the sh** out of me, lol. I know it will be good, but will it be long?
I hate the false positives and there were so many last year and the lousy sites are still ranking better. I mean, you would think Google read all the complaints all over the internet and trying to fix it…
Brankica recently posted..Website or blog | Why SBI beats WordPress any time
Ha! Yeah, it’s not nearly as long as Duct Tape SEO. It has 6 modules, the 6th is really a tip sheet of sorts, the other 5 are the meat and potatoes, plus an introduction. So 7 modules if you count the intro.
Page count…I’m editing it so I’m not even sure, it’s been written separately, module by module.
Not sure what to make of Google’s Panda update, to think it’s just all about quality is not the case considering the scraping is so easy to do and get away with…
Scrape > rewrite > rank just fine, thanks. That’s simply pathetic.
James Hussey recently posted..HostGator Cyber Monday Deal 2011 and Customer Review
I was wondering why you hadn’t posted in a while. Welcome back. Great post. Your Duct Tape SEO is working good for my 2 sites I’m currently working on. I’m really focusing on the strategies when I’m creating new posts and my google searches seem to be increasing. Looking forward to the new book.
Darren
Darren recently posted..TRX Suspension Trainer
Good to hear it, Darren! I’ve got some writing yet to do on the bonus materials, sales page, etc…and of course editing. But very glad the method’s working out for you. Thanks for weighing in!
James Hussey recently posted..BuildMyRank Results With 10 Free Links
I can honestly say that I’ve never had an experience like that where the traffic and rankings just drop so suddenly. I know that most of my sites may be somewhat different to the majority of the sites that you have since I probably only have about 20% affiliate sites but that’s still weird to me. At least you don’t panic about it!
In fact, I’m actually quite lazy and I’m not much of a stat checker. I only usually go looking at the stats when I notice the income is dipping! :P I’m getting better though and I’m trying to stay on top of things this year!
Those sites that you included the screenshots for – are they affiliate sites? You wouldn’t have a dip like that for a blog such as theaveragegenius.net or would you?
Nathan recently posted..Running PLR eBook
I don’t know about this site (TheAverageGenius) having any issues: I don’t monitor it at all. But the sites in question (the site I should say) is definitely an affiliate site.
I often wonder what people think when they say, “Niche site” or “affiliate site” – I think mine aren’t typical, but only because I’ve followed my own advice or Paula and Wanda’s in terms of quality. At least the sites I own that make me some cheddar aren’t typical niche sites in the way I see them normally taught.
Thinking about it, I don’t know what I mean by “affiliate site” either. :)I have sites that promote products and have over 1,000 pages and I also have other sites that promote products and they have between 15 and 30 pages. I guess I was referring to the latter when I said “affiliate sites”. I was wondering why I had never seen this type of dip before – whether it was down to the type of site or the way it was set up.
I wondered if, since this site (TAG) has over 200 pages, and my main sites have around 1,000 each, whether these sites were also experiencing an extreme dip like the one that you displayed in the screenshots. I’ve only ever really been able to look at my stats for my own sites and, as I sometimes see slight dips in traffic for my sites, they tend to be the skinnier sites with 15-30 pages. Of course, that could be down to a number of factors and not just size but I was curious if a blog such as this one also had that dip.
Nathan recently posted..Coffee Maker Review and Article PLR
One of the things I am always amazed at are some of the zany ideas people have as to what constitutes ‘quality’.
Some seem to think the number of pages are important. Hardly, page after page of useless drivel is still drivel.
Some seem to thing the use of proper English matters. Well, hardly. If consistent spelling and grammar mattered I’d be at the bottom of every ranking.
Some seem to think that CopyScape rules all. I don’t think so. I don’t use any spinner software, mainly because the output of all the spinners I have seen so far makes me nauseous. But I’ve seen plenty of spun pages ranging decently. And my best site of all has hundreds of non-original ‘contributed’ articles.
What does matter, in my opinion, is actually displaying information which helps someone with an actual problem.
I have seen so many ‘vacuum cleaner review’ sites and ‘best deals for movie downloads’ sites that I realize just how well of most Americans are. The ‘problems’ many people come up with are trivial.
Having a zit is a big problem to a teenage girl who likely has no money anyway.
Having no JOB? Now that’s a big problem to her dad, you can be sure of that.
Again, in my experience, sites that actually help people with real-world problems are doing very well, thank you.
Dave Starr recently posted..Buying a Condo in the Philippines — Intro
Definitely solving problems will get you an audience and get you traffic – one of the most trafficked posts I have on this blog is my LastPass vs. Roboform review, another is exporting Facebook contacts to G+…both solve problems. Neither really makes me money, but it definitely could lead to that if I played my cards right.
And you’re right: the “review sites” could stand a little soul (I’m with you on that).
I’ve been focusing a lot more on the “problem” aspect of things lately. It wasn’t something that I had done for a long time and I have a couple of sites that make good money, have strong rankings and are PR5 that don’t have anything to do with solving people’s problems at all.
Still, I’m trying to move in that direction and I find that it’s easier to get things going faster when I’m targeting buyers and those with problems. When I’m having to compete with pages of spun content though, it does make me wonder where this focus on “quality” is headed when I can spend hours on a post and someone can spin a quick post and rank just as well.
I’m just trying to stick with the quality and injecting a little style into the content and hope for the best that it works out beneficial in the long run.
Nathan recently posted..Positive Thinking PLR Report
Good to hear you bounced back, James! As you already know, IMO this is not directly related to Panda updates – it’s just normal “dancing” in the SERPs. I regularly see my sites drop for a couple of weeks (or sometimes a little less, sometimes a little more), usually because of some recent backlinking efforts I have done (even very minor efforts can cause the sites to dance).
Still, having good on page SEO is certainly a good idea, and I know your book as great at teaching this. But I imagine you’ll continue to see such dancing in the future, and probably the best “insurance” is to have multiple sites in your very profitable niche – especially given how much it costs you every time your site takes a two week vacation from the SERPs! ;)
Michelle recently posted..Looking Back At 2011 And Looking Forward To 2012
Yeah, that makes sense if you’re link building. ;)
But I wasn’t. It just happens out of the blue. But for sure, dancing happens during a campaign depending on your link velocity. Normally I don’t dance anywhere but up thanks to my precautions.
Sure, but also keep in mind that it doesn’t have to be you building the links. Still, covering all your bases is definitely good!
Michelle recently posted..Looking Back At 2011 And Looking Forward To 2012
Were you building me links again? :D
Or do you mean competitors building links to their sites?
The reason I think it was Panda each time is that it coincided with other webmasters’ reports and the timeline, but like anything: it’s just an educated guess.
Matt Cutts doesn’t talk to me. :)
But I am curious what you mean.
James Hussey recently posted..Beating Google Panda in 2012 – Rankings Bouncing Back
Not me – but I would check Majestic Seo’s results for your site to see if there is some if there are any link building showing up in the few days prior to your drop (hint, hint). If there are, you need to figure out where those links are coming from. It could be that links you built a while back are just showing up now (for various reasons), that there is some “natural” link building to your site (usually a good thing, although it can cause dancing), or that a competitor is deliberately trying to sabotage you.
I don’t think there was any major algo update around Dec 24th but of course Google does minor updates its algo all the time. In my experience, however, drops because of algo changes take a lot longer to recover from, while two weeks is a typical “dance” period for me.
I guess my main concern is that it seems like now whenever someone’s site starts dancing around they blame it on Panda. I’m NOT saying that’s what you are doing here, BTW – but it is just a concern of mine. There are a lot of reasons for a site to drop (especially temporarily) in the rankings …
Michelle recently posted..Looking Back At 2011 And Looking Forward To 2012
None showing in the fresh index on the affected pages.
The ironic thing is that I made a lot in December, despite the dip, so can’t complain too much. What I “would’ve made” vs. what I did is another matter, but I can’t worry about that.
And I know what you mean about everyone being up in arms about Panda – but each time I was affected (only a few times), it coincided with reports of others being affected.
Carrie mentioned there would be no “major” updates to Google – this was definitely a minor one compared to other times I’ve been affected. In May, I was hit for about 30 days. This time it was only a few pages and I got affected for only a week.
But was it definitely Panda or not?
Honestly I can’t say for sure: Google wouldn’t tell me even if I asked. I’m not quite that important a story. I assume it was with all things considered:
- Other webmasters (SERountable for one) reporting a minor update around the same time…
- No link-building to the affected pages that I can see (I was writing the new book)…
- Temporary dive and then climb, as has happened other times in the year, out of the blue…
Definitely fits w/what I’ve seen in times past with other Panda updates.
But you bring an entirely different view point – you mention that others might be trying to sabotage me – so now I’m wondering when you started viewing link-building as a means of sabotage?
(At least from the widely accepted idea that link-building can’t sabotage a site, otherwise we’d all be doing it to gain a seat at the table.)
I’d be curious to know if you’ve seen that yourself. (Insert wicked laugh.)
Things are too quiet, how about a new post :)
What a great mindset you have James! Actually I’ve read some reviews and blogs about Google Panda and one thing similar. They say that content is the key to beat Panda, which I totally agree. Providing quality content with relevancy and value REGULARLY is the key to be ahead.
I really don’t know what is wrong with Panda. However, the prevalence of those rewritten post remain as the biggest evidence of the “inefficiency” and “inaccuracy” of their system.
Your Duct Tape SEO looks something worthwhile to read.
Christopher Campbell recently posted..Reader Questions: Makeup Brushes for Mineral Foundation
Good stuff James. I have not seen of any Pandas but I think it’s a lot due the fact that I try to keep aff links to the minimum. A lot of people talks just about backlinks and their quality. But what’s happening on-page is actually where searchengine bots can determine what to do with sites and the quality of it… Not so much with backlinks because any “spammer” that have created them even to harm competition.
Matts recently posted..Planned Success How To Keep Yourself Motivated?
It’s always good to post about google’s updates. We will never really know what they are up to next. Wonder what will be in stall for 2012?
Amy Martin recently posted..Sigma Brushes – Dry’n Shape System